[SPOILERS] Golden Sickle Quest Line
Verfasst: 06.04.2019 19:56
Just finished the Golden Sickle Questline. I was a little frustrated after reading through the Wiki, only to discover
It felt as if there was no 'truth' to the actual sacking of the caravan. I have no issue with choosing sides, or moral grey areas, but to make the truth fit what the character choose, seems like a frustrating way to have the quest laid out. I would have much preferred to either feel betrayed when I sided with the actual bad guys (I tend toward the good guys more on my playthroughs), or feeling righteous when you helped uncover who the bad guys were and were able to take them down.
Something like the Rhalata questiline, where no matter what choice you take, the story itself is already there, and the your choices effect how the story plays out and what happens. .
I hope I'm not explaining myself poorly, and was hoping to get some insight on why it was designed this way, particularly because from a character motivation perspective Edit by Moderator (Stefanie):
I fixed the spoilers once, you must behind spoiler=... write something behind it, a title.
Something like the Rhalata questiline, where no matter what choice you take, the story itself is already there, and the your choices effect how the story plays out and what happens. .
I hope I'm not explaining myself poorly, and was hoping to get some insight on why it was designed this way, particularly because from a character motivation perspective Edit by Moderator (Stefanie):
I fixed the spoilers once, you must behind spoiler=... write something behind it, a title.